Drew Wylie is joining forces with colleagues elsewhere in Europe to support organisations whose work aligns with strands of European Commission investment but who find it difficult to translate this into successful applications or to work with partners from around Europe. While these challenge may be administrative, technical or knowledge based, recent discussions with cultural policy experts in Wroclaw (1) reminded me that we don’t always think about the cultural policy and intent that underpins many of these investment streams. The conference grappled with the implications of culture remaining at the margins of the Human Rights Convention at a time when inter-cultural dialogue is a necessity. The work of Dorota Jurkiewicz-Eckert (2), one of the contingent of young Polish experts at the meeting, also points out that culture is missing from ‘Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (2010). Just as at the national level, we are continually having to restate, justify, and reinvent culture’s contribution to Europe while the technocrats’s holy trinity of ‘innovation’, ‘creativity’ and ‘growth’ gains pace. Yet we share common cause with our culture sector peers and partners throughout Europe.
When we consider the newly published calls for culture in the Horizon 2020 programme, our preparations for the 2016 Creative Europe Guarantee Facility, or even our closer to home ERDF proposals, we should also consider our relationship to the EU and European culture as a whole. This wider perspective works internally to involve everyone, from Board member to project team, and externally with partners who may have a different organisational culture and criteria of success.
- http://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/index.php
- http://www.ce.uw.edu.pl/pliki/tresc/program_wydawniczy/ksiazki/IntroSpisTresci.pdf